Field 382 (Medium of performance) has a subfield r for Total number of individuals performing alongside ensembles, subfield s for Total number of performers and subfield t for Total number of ensembles. All of the subfields contain only a number.
The conversion places the information in bf:note, which seems awkward to us. The note label contains both the semantics and the number, which does not facilitate machine processing.
Subfield r
[ a bf:MusicMedium ;
bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
rdfs:label "Total performers alongside ensembles: 382 r" ] ],
Subfield s
[ a bf:MusicMedium ;
bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
rdfs:label "Total performers: 382 s" ] ],
Subfield t
[ a bf:MusicMedium ;
bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
rdfs:label "Total ensembles: 382 t" ] ] ;
It is more straightforward to place the semantics in a label and the number in bf:count, which parallels the treatment of subfields e and n from subfields a, b, d and p. It would be very helpful to standardize label texts across cataloging agencies to simplify machine processing.
Field 382 (Medium of performance) has a subfield r for Total number of individuals performing alongside ensembles, subfield s for Total number of performers and subfield t for Total number of ensembles. All of the subfields contain only a number.
The conversion places the information in bf:note, which seems awkward to us. The note label contains both the semantics and the number, which does not facilitate machine processing.
Subfield r
Subfield s
Subfield t
It is more straightforward to place the semantics in a label and the number in bf:count, which parallels the treatment of subfields e and n from subfields a, b, d and p. It would be very helpful to standardize label texts across cataloging agencies to simplify machine processing.
For example:
Subfield r
Subfield s
Subfield t