Closed colbyr closed 8 years ago
In 1.3.2 "The general form of a let expression" example, it seems to me that (<varN> <varN>) should be (<varN> <expN>).
(<varN> <varN>)
(<varN> <expN>)
That's right, thanks!
In 1.3.2 "The general form of a let expression" example, it seems to me that
(<varN> <varN>)
should be(<varN> <expN>)
.