Figure SI-3

[srcorsi-USGS]

@ldecicco-USGS For Fig SI-3 barchart with the number of sites with EAR > 10^-3, add the number of sites where the chemical was detected across the top. This will match with just how we analyzed the data within the manuscript.

[ldecicco-USGS]

Like this?

[srcorsi-USGS]

Nope. What was added was the number of sites with EAR > 0.001. What we want is the number of sites where the chemical was detected (including those that did not have EAR > 0.001). In this case, would it be most appropriate to put that number across the top or within the bars like you have it? @ldecicco-USGS

[ldecicco-USGS]

Yeah, if it's not just the number in the bar, it should be across the top or bottom, I didn't understand what you were asking for.

[ldecicco-USGS]

How about that? Do you prefer that or mixing the bar/text? Since they actually have the same scale, we could do it visually like this (unlike a lot of our other plots)

[srcorsi-USGS]

Yes, I like this format. Legend should read: Detected

10-3

[ldecicco-USGS]