Closed ldocao closed 5 years ago
I guess this is a problem between PCam and camelyon16 dataset, the magnification doesn't look like to be the same. The only information I have is "The PCam dataset contains 327,680 patches extracted from Camelyon16 at a size of 96 × 96 pixels @ 10× magnification" without further details.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.03962.pdf
details provided here https://github.com/basveeling/pcam#details doesn't help
Actually, the difference in score must be biased because I took the max. I need to check the score over tile predictions, and check if the score is indeed different or not. The score should be higher for tiles-level than for patient-level. If so, it might be worth exploring the possibility of constructing a score from tile to patient, smarter than just taking the max. Indeed, if the model is wrong over a single tile, ie it predicts high probability instead of low, then the whole patient is classified as positive.
current AUC score is 0.63, which is very low
in principle though, we should be able to get a very high score : https://basveeling.nl/posts/pcam/