Closed JonnyTech closed 5 years ago
Yes it's just a typo. It's actually "ofxNDIsender > ofxNDIsend". The idea is that the classes without the "er" can be used exactly as they were and they do not depend on Openframeworks. The new classes extend them and require Openframeworks. I have update the readme.
So should ofNDIreceive be ofxNDIreceive?
Yes, another typo. Will fix later. Look at the header files for what the names are if you are unsure.
I pushed the latest corrections which you should have if you are using this. Audio receiving work is included but not fully tested.
Great, thanks - makes sense now - sorry, I'm a noob and the headers were confusing me.
ofxNDIsender > ofxNDIsender
is not a change!