Closed jvprat closed 7 years ago
I've factored out the optional functionality into its own wrapper type. It can be transparently applied to any type, so there's no more need to have checks for optional on every type.
I've added support for the optional option again but I don't know if this implementation is too intrusive.
sorry about the delay, looks fine!
I've factored out the optional functionality into its own wrapper type. It can be transparently applied to any type, so there's no more need to have checks for optional on every type.