Closed nomeata closed 1 week ago
there is already a isDefEq in ensureHasType and previously was another one after rewriting in hType. If we just always rewrite in hType, then we may get away with just one isDefEq.
isDefEq
ensureHasType
hType
Not really a good idea, it can to rewriting twice where only once is desired.
there is already a
isDefEq
inensureHasType
and previously was another one after rewriting inhType
. If we just always rewrite inhType
, then we may get away with just oneisDefEq
.