Open cisaacstern opened 1 year ago
Our current test coverage of climsim_utils.data_utils is 12%, as seen here:
climsim_utils.data_utils
https://github.com/leap-stc/ClimSim/actions/runs/5898192566/job/15998878076#step:5:43
That is not surprising because our only test is a smoke test for importability:
https://github.com/leap-stc/ClimSim/blob/f7d092cbaf57d79d47fa56dc0fd3e00a391da696/tests/test_data_utils.py#L5-L6
We should increase unit test coverage of data_utils to establish a benchmark of functionality before attempting any refactoring, such as proposed in #17. 95% or greater coverage would be a strong basis to shoot for.
data_utils
Our current test coverage of
climsim_utils.data_utilsis 12%, as seen here:That is not surprising because our only test is a smoke test for importability:
https://github.com/leap-stc/ClimSim/blob/f7d092cbaf57d79d47fa56dc0fd3e00a391da696/tests/test_data_utils.py#L5-L6
We should increase unit test coverage of
data_utilsto establish a benchmark of functionality before attempting any refactoring, such as proposed in #17. 95% or greater coverage would be a strong basis to shoot for.