This lab introduces rspec and we ask the user to use it instead of the learn command. Since running learn for tests creates valuable data for us (test frequency, duration between tests etc) I think it would be preferable if we described learn as wrapping rspec and continue to have user run the learn command.
Not a bug, but a suggestion:
This lab introduces rspec and we ask the user to use it instead of the learn command. Since running learn for tests creates valuable data for us (test frequency, duration between tests etc) I think it would be preferable if we described learn as wrapping rspec and continue to have user run the learn command.