Closed Remi-Gau closed 3 years ago
I personally like the MIT license, but approve with whatever license choice you make.
Random thought: maybe something lile a CC-BY license would be enough, no?
The Turing way has a CC-BY for the non-code content and an MIT one for the code and infra:
https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/the-turing-way/blob/master/LICENSE.md
Sounds good to me either way! In case you'll add both, it would probably be good to make a short note which one for what (which could be in a LICENSE.md file as in the turing way example). Ping if you need help/eyes. Otherwise all thumbs up to you :)
Dear contributors @katjaq, @r03ert0, @roopa-pai, @Remi-Gau, @IRuotsa, @martinagvilas, @complexbrains, @rutgerfick, @pbellec, @jesparent, @jdkent, @avakiai, @Lestropie, @dr-xenia, @dfsp-spirit, @DominiqueMakowski,
Thank you very much for all your contributions to this project.
I would like to stress out that this repo does not contain License file, this involves that:
Do you mind if we add License to this project? e.g. MIT License?
If you are in favour of adding license, please annotate my message with +1 emoji (or -1 if not). I am not a specialist in licensing so other suggestions of License are welcome :)
Best, Alexandre