Closed Remi-Gau closed 4 years ago
I am more or less OK with how this looks for now.
@roopa-pai @alexandreroutier I would need another pair of eyes to double check that those templates look fine (not too complicated to discourage their use and not too simple that they might be missing some important information).
Some thoughts: I think it's neither too simple nor too complicated. However, the links (e.g. software>code repository) are broken in the example, which may be confusing.
good point.
Since they are dummy examples it might be weird to make them point to to actual stuff.
Maybe I can present the actual markdown code and show below what it would give.
@roopa-pai have a look now and let me know if it less confusing.
This also makes it easier for people to find the templates
Good point this might be a bit obscure.
Actually the thing is that this pull request will create a menu in the github "issue" tab where people get directly prompted with the correct code snippet for what they want to add.
See the BIDS specification issue tab. https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/new/choose
But you are correct that this totally requires a little extra to be more explicit. Thanks. :-)
Good point this might be a bit obscure.
Actually the thing is that this pull request will create a menu in the github "issue" tab where people get directly prompted with the correct code snippet for what they want to add.
See the BIDS specification issue tab. https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/new/choose
But you are correct that this totally requires a little extra to be more explicit. Thanks. :-)
I see, that's perfect then!
This is a work in progress to set up templates.
It also implements the drop down boxes by using some extension of MKDOCS material.
Fixes issue #57
Related to issue #43
TO DO