Closed DominiqueMakowski closed 4 years ago
Hey Dominique Thanks for this addition. This is great.
We are in the middle of a restructuring of this repo to help us better curate new contributions. See issues #63 and pull request #79 .
Are you OK if I put your suggestion on hold until we have a better idea what the new landscape will look like? :-)
sure!
@DominiqueMakowski
I have created a new pull request #92 to integrate your suggestion.
I am using the software 'templates' we are using so double check to make sure nothing is missing.
I realized that the neurokit is already listed in the EEG and MEG page: do you think it makes sense to remove it from there? I think that avoiding duplicates would be better but I am not dead set against it.
Let me know what you think.
Feel free to close this PR then ☺️
I realized that the neurokit is already listed in the EEG and MEG page: do you think it makes sense to remove it from there? I think that avoiding duplicates would be better but I am not dead set against it.
Mmh given that neurokit's support for M/EEG is currently still a bit feeble compared to biosignals, I'd say it's best to remove it from now from there and leave it only in physiological signals.
OK. Will remove from the EEG and MEG page then.
Let me know in the other PR if things looks good to you. :-)
Biosignals (ECG, EDA, EMG, EGG, EOG etc.) are often used in conjunction with more traditional neuroimaging techniques, and are also, although indirectly, part of 'neuroimaging'. Thus I thought it'd be nice to have a page for that, and I added a software to kickstart it (conflicts of interest, I'm a contributor of that software ☺️).
Maybe the title of the page could be shortened, but here it's consistent with the other 2 pages for MEEG and MRI.