Add logging to setup and initialize_kalite (2)

[benjaoming]

Taking over from #5438

Summary

This also (once again) prints the server address at command line ( a regression from #5364 )

TODO

If not all TODOs are marked, this PR is considered WIP (work in progress)

• [x] Has documentation been written/updated?
• [x] Have you written release notes for the upcoming release?

Reviewer guidance

Let me know if there are problems in this approach. I don't see much of a difference, except I forced ALL of the loggers in kalite.distributed.management.commands to user a logger WITHOUT formatting, expecting their outputs to be generally targeted for command line displaying.

However, they are also subject to be printed in the server log.

Issues addressed

5408

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #5441 into 0.17.x will increase coverage by 0.2%. The diff coverage is 8.47%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           0.17.x    #5441     +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   51.73%   51.94%   +0.2%     
=========================================
  Files         143      143             
  Lines        7494     7466     -28     
=========================================
+ Hits         3877     3878      +1     
+ Misses       3617     3588     -29

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...stributed/management/commands/initialize_kalite.py	0% <0%> (ø)	:arrow_up:
kalite/distributed/management/commands/setup.py	0% <0%> (ø)	:arrow_up:
kalite/settings/base.py	88.78% <75%> (+0.1%)	:arrow_up:
kalite/cli.py	29.03% <9.52%> (-0.11%)	:arrow_down:
kalite/distributed/views.py	59.23% <0%> (-0.64%)	:arrow_down:

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update a5fbd46...17e2754. Read the comment docs.

[benjaoming]

Doesn't seem like it's possible to trick Codecov into a new coverage report, leaving it here.