Open ivanistheone opened 4 years ago
^ @rtibbles @khangmach @jonboiser something to consider for 0.15
@ivanistheone are there any user reports you've collected that support your feedback?
@khangmach Nothing from the field, but lots of "these steps are confusing" from internal use.
I realize dropdowns are bad UX, so maybe the suggestion ^ is not the best. Y'all probably had good reason to switch to this new flow.
@carinediaz had suggested a general need to review the content management steps under different languages (e.g. Spanish) because certain actions don't translate well and add additional friction. In particular, the UI elements and verbs around task management showing up right next to channels were confusing (e.g. "clear" referring to tasks could be misinterpreted as a channel action). Perhaps a hack session where you ask people to import some channels, update them, delete, and export?
@ivanistheone I understand your concerns about the extra click and dual action bottom bar which ties in with the selection process and will keep some of these points in mind for any next iterations. I don't think this is an issue at the moment however and your suggestion was actually an early concept I tried out but decided against in the design phase haha. There are a lot of moving, complicated parts to this so I'd like to leave this to design before abruptly tackling this as a "to-do"
very much +1 on the user feedback given by @ivanistheone. Once you go through the flow a few dozens times, it makes a lot of sense
Observed behavior
Current setup:
Problems with current setup:
Expected behavior
User-facing consequences
Uniform presentation of channel actions like in older versions of Kolibri would be make it easier for Kolibri users to know what they can do with channels.