Open jesyspa opened 9 years ago
CC0 Universal is my personal favourite, since we don't need to care about anything.
I'd like whatever we choose to be short enough to fit on a page or two.
Having looked at CC licenses, it looks like they're a good fit unless we want to protect the source form of the book particularly strongly (i.e. copyleft). I don't think this is that big a deal; I suspect any text modifications will be a bigger deal than how to express it in LaTeX. Therefore, I suggest licensing the book under CC-SA. The code can be put under MIT or something like that.
It makes tons of sense to have a different license for the code than the license.
I didn't comment on the CC-SA. I like it. It's to the point. Further, a cursory search makes me think we can apply the creative commons license fairly easily, and without needing to incorporate the full text of the license:
I think it'd make it possible to have a 'license' page that looks similar to what @jesyspa has already linked (as opposed to the whole license)
CC-SA is perfectly fine with me. :)
To be honest, I don't know what would be a good choice. I think the FDL has shown itself to be rather impractical. Perhaps some form of CC?