Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hi,
I agree, predictable ports are a useful feature. I marked it as
"Type-Enhancement".
Roland
Original comment by rolmie@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2011 at 7:56
I ack also.
One note: we have to differentiate between VTUNER_DISCOVER_PORT (what is static
value 0x9989) and VTUNER_SESSION_DATA_PORT + VTUNER_SESSION_COMMAND_PORT (which
are made dynamically). Second ports we can't make static fully, because of
possibility of more then one session (not now, but in close future :-)
So, first step - very simple - is to add config option for discovery port.
May be later we can even add option for semi-static session ports.
/Honza
Original comment by jpetrous
on 5 Sep 2011 at 8:08
to make firewalling easier, it should be sufficient to allocate this
from a given port range, the size of the range has to be 2*(number of
tuners). Another way would be to listen on fixed ports for command and
data session.
Original comment by rolmie@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2011 at 8:16
no deveopment on this suggestion?
Original comment by axf...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 9:53
Well, I would prefer to finish fixes for kernel 3.3, but seems there is still
no simple way of testing (if somebody can give me hint which linux distro has
kernel 3.3 inside I would really appreciate that) so I can work on this "port
fixing" feature on the weekend.
I drop msg if get something useful.
Honza
Original comment by jpetrous
on 11 Apr 2012 at 9:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kriss...@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2011 at 7:31