Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Right, I can see how that would be a problem. Those are LINQ-to-SQL classes,
right?
(I'm just trying to figure out if the best approach is to allow it to silently
ignore
them, or whether it needs to include them).
I'll try to reproduce here (with DBML) so that I can see the best option.
Annoyingly,
v2 provides much better flexibility over what it includes, but the inheritance
stuff is
still a while away in v2. So I'll have to fit it in v1 ;-p
Original comment by marc.gravell
on 26 Mar 2010 at 8:29
Mark, yes -- these are Linq-to-Sql classes.
For my purposes it really doesn't matter whether you invoke initializers at
all, but
if possible it would seem best to invoke the most derived initializer on a
given
class instance.
Thank you.
Original comment by abesid...@gmail.com
on 28 Mar 2010 at 2:43
Original comment by marc.gravell
on 22 Apr 2010 at 9:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
abesid...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2010 at 9:35