I encountered a strange result while analysing RNA-seq data with derfinder. My goal is to find expressed regions in a number of conditions which broadly derfinder does. The issue is that it seems that the reported regions are smaller than what would be expected by visual inspection:
As you can see there is quite a large expressed region of which only a fraction is detected. This doesn't seem to be an issue of low coverage because, to the left, there is a an area with similar high coverage which is not reported as expressed. This an example but I found several of these in my data.
The question is now if this a setting which needs to be changed, or is this something to be expected?
I encountered a strange result while analysing RNA-seq data with derfinder. My goal is to find expressed regions in a number of conditions which broadly
derfinder
does. The issue is that it seems that the reported regions are smaller than what would be expected by visual inspection:As you can see there is quite a large expressed region of which only a fraction is detected. This doesn't seem to be an issue of low coverage because, to the left, there is a an area with similar high coverage which is not reported as expressed. This an example but I found several of these in my data.
The question is now if this a setting which needs to be changed, or is this something to be expected?
The analysis was run with the following settings:
files are bam files, read length = 75 and cutoff = 5. Session info can be found here.