Open leeyiheng12 opened 2 years ago
Reject this Bug. As it is documented in the application the error message specifically, hence the user is provided the correct information and does not affect the functionality of the application Alternatively, this would be a VeryLow Severity Documentation Bug since the error message is accurate but the constraint is missing from the UG.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: The fact remains that the app's behaviour differs from the UG. One would expect the UG to provide correct instructions on how to use the app. If the UG was intended to be unclear and/or provide different instructions from what the app promises, then it would go against the purpose of having the UG. In this case, by following the UG, the user would be unable to perform a task that he/she expected to be able to perform, thus it is still a bug.
Team chose [type.DocumentationBug
]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: According to the CS2103 website, bugs of severity "VeryLow" are flaws that do not affect usage, and only cosmetic problems should have this label. The differing instructions between the UG and the app affects usage directly (the app cannot deliver what the UG promised, and stopped the user), and is more than a cosmetic problem.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Enter:
add n/TestCompany/TestCompany j/TestJob p/1234 e/testemail@test.sg a/TestAddress t/SoftwareEngineering pt/HIGH ast/ACCEPTED t/BasedInSingapore
Expected behaviour:
Application added, with name of the company as "TestCompany/TestCompany"
Actual behaviour:
Unable to add application, with error message "Names should only contain alphanumeric characters and spaces, and it should not be blank", even though UG did not specify this constraint
Screenshot: