search

lefou / pojosr

A service registry that enables OSGi style service registry programs
5 stars 2 forks source link

0.1.7-SNAPSHOT listed as version in the 0.1.8 release #4

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I am using POJOSR 0.1.8 release with camel-test-blueprint component.

And if for some reason POJOSR/Blueprint does not startup properly, we report to 
System.err. And I noticed that it say 0.1.7-SNAPSHOT in the version.

Test bundle headers: Bundle-ManifestVersion=2, Bundle-Name=System Bundle, 
Bundle-SymbolicName=de.kalpatec.pojosr.framework, Bundle-Vendor=kalpatec, 
Bundle-Version=0.1.7-SNAPSHOT

Original issue reported on code.google.com by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 2:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Yes, you are right - I forgot to update the header during the release. Is that 
a problem for you or is it enough to fix it in a future release?

Original comment by karlpauls on 26 Jan 2012 at 12:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
No problem for me. Just spotted it.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 26 Jan 2012 at 12:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Is this fixed?

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 11:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Well, there hasn't been a new release so no - not in 0.1.8. If it is a problem 
for you I can quickly roll a 0.2 release for you...

Original comment by karlpauls on 25 Oct 2012 at 12:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Thanks, I just wonder if the fix is to read the version from the MANIFEST.MF or 
something so you wont have to remember to change the hardcoded version for each 
release. And then just have the same problem in future releases.

A new release would be lovely, but with the OSGi 4.3 supported as well, which I 
logged a ticket #5 about.

Would love a bit more active on this project, so it can grow and hopefully 
become part of Felix out of the box. So more people use it and make their osgi 
unit test lives much easier.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Yeah, that would make some sense. I think in felix framework, we use some maven 
magic to substitute the value. I can try to get this ported over.

Original comment by karlpauls on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
0.2.0 should have the correct version

Original comment by karlpauls on 4 Nov 2012 at 8:55