Closed ver09934 closed 5 years ago
Oh, good question. merge, I guess? Really, whatever is easiest for you. I am not fussy about keeping the history beautiful.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:09 PM Ian Vernooy notifications@github.com wrote:
@ver09934 commented on this pull request.
In map/views.py https://github.com/legacysurvey/decals-web/pull/48#discussion_r305446514 :
- from PIL import Image, ImageDraw
- img = Image.open(tilefn)
- ra, dec = wcs.crval
- pixscale = np.abs(wcs.cd[0]) * 3600
- width, height = img.size
- ralo = ra - ((width / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- rahi = ra + ((width / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- declo = dec - ((height / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- dechi = dec + ((height / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- import requests
- json_url = 'http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/lslga/1/cat.json?ralo={}&rahi={}&declo={}&dechi={}'.format(ralo, rahi, declo, dechi)
- r = requests.get(json_url).json()
Awesome, thanks! A quick question: to incorporate the changes into my branch, would it be preferred for me to merge or rebase?
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/legacysurvey/decals-web/pull/48?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIEH7LJGOG2C22D6ZZJ453QAHYMZA5CNFSM4IE3NVP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOB7AVVUA#discussion_r305446514, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIEH7PGJDTALSO25TWXVL3QAHYMZANCNFSM4IE3NVPQ .
And by the way, that function could return some LSLGA objects that don't actually touch the requested box, because it only checks the radius and assumes a circle, not the correct ellipse.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:11 PM Dustin Lang dstndstn@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, good question. merge, I guess? Really, whatever is easiest for you. I am not fussy about keeping the history beautiful.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:09 PM Ian Vernooy notifications@github.com wrote:
@ver09934 commented on this pull request.
In map/views.py https://github.com/legacysurvey/decals-web/pull/48#discussion_r305446514 :
- from PIL import Image, ImageDraw
- img = Image.open(tilefn)
- ra, dec = wcs.crval
- pixscale = np.abs(wcs.cd[0]) * 3600
- width, height = img.size
- ralo = ra - ((width / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- rahi = ra + ((width / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- declo = dec - ((height / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- dechi = dec + ((height / 2) * pixscale / 3600)
- import requests
- json_url = 'http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/lslga/1/cat.json?ralo={}&rahi={}&declo={}&dechi={}'.format(ralo, rahi, declo, dechi)
- r = requests.get(json_url).json()
Awesome, thanks! A quick question: to incorporate the changes into my branch, would it be preferred for me to merge or rebase?
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/legacysurvey/decals-web/pull/48?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIEH7LJGOG2C22D6ZZJ453QAHYMZA5CNFSM4IE3NVP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOB7AVVUA#discussion_r305446514, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIEH7PGJDTALSO25TWXVL3QAHYMZANCNFSM4IE3NVPQ .
OK, thanks. Whether the ellipses are in the box or not shouldn't cause any problems; they will just get drawn outside the frame, which PIL doesn't seem to care about.
Great, just thought I'd mention the potential pitfall!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:20 PM Ian Vernooy notifications@github.com wrote:
OK, thanks. Whether the ellipses are in the box or not shouldn't cause any problems; they will just get drawn outside the frame, which PIL doesn't seem to care about.
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/legacysurvey/decals-web/pull/48?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIEH7IZGHL7SQPOUO2SW23QAHZVTA5CNFSM4IE3NVP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2MHNRA#issuecomment-513308356, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIEH7KDL57ON5NEWVXM3A3QAHZVTANCNFSM4IE3NVPQ .
This is now live in the "dev" version:
http://legacysurvey.org//viewer-dev/cutout.jpg?ra=25.9303&dec=4.2215&pixscale=0.5&layer=dr8&lslga
Thanks, Ian!
(Do we want to change the color? Or allow the color to be specified as a URL argument? Apparently the color on the interactive version in #3388ff.)
That's awesome!
Perhaps we could do something like this for the color:
ellipse_color = '#' + req.GET.get('lslgacolor', '#3388ff').lstrip('#')
draw.ellipse(box_corners, fill=None, outline=ellipse_color, width=3)
That seems like a great option!
Should I submit another pull request with these changes?
Should I submit another pull request with these changes?
Yup, a 1-line PR is the way to go.
Hi Ian,
This is great! I have some minor comments that I'll make in-line, but this is impressive progress!
--dustin