There's one night of MzLS data with zero-point values (ZPT and CCDZPT) that are unusually large numbers, implying those data are deeper.
There's no indication in the observing logs that that one night in the middle of a run was different than any other night, so this must be something different in the reductions/gains/flats? Example file mosaicz/MZLS_CP/CP20160517v2/k4m_160518_052742_ooi_zd_v2.fits.fz
The attached figure shows the distribution of ZPT values for MzLS, with this one night in red.
The latest from Frank on this issue from Mar 29, 2019: "Each night is calibrated with the flats for that night. I checked the flats for the night and they were properly normalized to unity. I also checked the zeropoint vs sky level correction and it seemed fine. To do more I would have to take more drastic steps of removing calibrations and trending for several preceding nights and start from the earlier date."
There's one night of MzLS data with zero-point values (ZPT and CCDZPT) that are unusually large numbers, implying those data are deeper.
There's no indication in the observing logs that that one night in the middle of a run was different than any other night, so this must be something different in the reductions/gains/flats? Example file mosaicz/MZLS_CP/CP20160517v2/k4m_160518_052742_ooi_zd_v2.fits.fz
The attached figure shows the distribution of ZPT values for MzLS, with this one night in red.
The latest from Frank on this issue from Mar 29, 2019: "Each night is calibrated with the flats for that night. I checked the flats for the night and they were properly normalized to unity. I also checked the zeropoint vs sky level correction and it seemed fine. To do more I would have to take more drastic steps of removing calibrations and trending for several preceding nights and start from the earlier date."
This issue is moved over from the deprecated legacyzpts product https://github.com/legacysurvey/legacyzpts/issues/51