Closed djschlegel closed 4 years ago
Do you want to make the limit something like 0.45, so that 0.5 is valid?
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 10:55 AM David Schlegel notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #498 https://github.com/legacysurvey/legacypipe/issues/498 to @dstndstn https://github.com/dstndstn.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/legacysurvey/legacypipe/issues/498?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIEH7NZDD3X4ZO72TUQSDTRBBK7LA5CNFSM4KPJNKEKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWZEXG43VMVCXMZLOORHG65DJMZUWGYLUNFXW5KTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOWMAR4KQ#event-3003194922, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIEH7JNICOWZ63HYVU2RJLRBBK7LANCNFSM4KPJNKEA .
I would make n=0.5
the minimum and flag the fits that run up against that value.
This change was implemented as in currently in master
. (The bigger issue is that most SER
fits are crap!)
The dr9d test reductions allowed Sersic indices as low as n=0.29. Set this lower limit to n=0.5 instead (which is a gaussian profile), and flag when that fitting limit is hit.