search

legesher / legesher-translations

Home of all the translations for spoken languages into programming language
MIT License
53 stars 109 forks source link

Review Language: Finnish (Python) #170

Open madiedgar opened 3 years ago

madiedgar commented 3 years ago

Review Finnish Translations for Python

In order to review this language to the project, complete the steps detailed in the translation guide (from Step #6 onward). We are primarily working developing Legesher for the Python programming language. In the future we hope to add more programming languages in the future.

Reviewing a translation is extremely important as we want to best understand the culture and context behind the words we select as keywords for the programming languages. The more perspectives the better! 👀Please take your time in being thorough with these translations. Think back when you were learning how to program and how context of words help you bridge together meaning and functionality.

⚠️ Note: this issue is to review the Python keywords and builtin functions only. Any additional translation reviews are encouraged, but not necessary.

To complete this issue:

Reviewers Needed

In order to add the translations for official use across Legesher, the translations will need to be approved and accepted by 5 additional native / fluent speakers. If you would like to be one of the reviewers for this language, please mention in this issue! :smile: Also feel free to loop in a friend that might be able to help with the translations! Please refer to the translation guide for the next step in the review process.

Review Status:

sjarva commented 3 years ago

I'd love to review this! I'm also calling @minna-xD and @eevajonnapanula, would you like to and have time to review Finnish translations? 😄

minna-xD commented 3 years ago

Yes, I can help with this!

madiedgar commented 3 years ago

Awesome! Thank you @sjarva and @minna-xD, let me know if you have any questions along the way!

minna-xD commented 3 years ago

This is a silly question but I wasn't able to find out the answer by looking at the existing contributions: You say "Leave a # @username ✅_with any additional commentary afterwards_" but then the sample line is: int: "initiatorsTranslation" # ✅ @firstreviewer, ❓@secondreviewer what about this otherTranslation I suppose there's really no difference as long as it's clear enough but is there a preference? Which should come first? The icon noting the status or the reviewer name?

madiedgar commented 3 years ago

@minna-xD not a silly question at all! Rather it's a great catch👍🏾

As long as it is clear what review is yours, the order of elements in the review is entirely up to you. The order of reviewers is more important, as the reviewer order will be used if there is a word that needs to have further discussion.

minna-xD commented 3 years ago

The order of reviewers is more important

Good to know!

minna-xD commented 3 years ago

I'd love to review this! I'm also calling minna-xD and eevajonnapanula, would you like to and have time to review Finnish translations? 😄

Could we get some of our other LUK friends to join, do you think @sjarva?

madiedgar commented 11 months ago

Happy October @minna-xD, @sjarva , and @rouskuli , thank you for your early support on this project! I'm excited about adding the Finnish translation to Legesher, but I could use your assistance in gathering enough reviewers. Would you consider reaching out to your friends or peers who share an interest and invite them to join us? 😄 Thank you!