Closed christophecricket closed 4 years ago
PD controller and passive elements (springs and dampers) are integrated using an implicit method (http://raisim.com/sections/ArticulatedSystem.html#pd-controller). The dynamics and contacts are integrated using a time-stepping method (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8255551). The position is updated using a trapezoidal rule (which I found to be more accurate than explicit and semi-implicit methods.).
I think this is too much detail for users. Why do you want to know about the integration scheme? How would this be useful for the users?
I'm using Raisim to render force for a teleoperation system (shown in part 2 of this, if you're interested https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/88057 ). I was having some problems last week with the quality of my rendered force, and was wondering if solver errors were playing a part. Turns out this wasn't the case, but I thought I'd ask so that I know next time it pops up.
I think you probably have a better idea for the use cases of Raisim than I do, so you're probably a much better judge of whether this would be useful for users than I would be. If I'm the first person to ask this, maybe it shouldn't be your highest priority, indeed :)
Just out of interest, I thought the trapezoidal rule counted as a semi-implicit integration method. What's the distinction?
I guess I forgot to answer this. Trapezoidal rule is x{t+1} = x{t} + (v{t} +v{t+1}) 0.5 dt. semi implicit is x{t+1} = x{t} + v_{t+1} * dt
Hi
I can't find it in the documentation, and the source is difficult to peruse, but what kind of an integration scheme does raisim use? I'm assuming it's some kind of a fixed step explicit method, but I was just wondering which one.