Open davidkarlsen opened 8 years ago
@legsem Ping?
The choice of AGPL for LegStar 2 is deliberate. My experience with LegStar 1 (which is LGPL, a business friendly license), is that most users are happy to use the software for free without ever contributing anything back.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, David J. M. Karlsen < notifications@github.com> wrote:
@legsem https://github.com/legsem Ping?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/legsem/legstar-core2/issues/18#issuecomment-158333674 .
Hm - I would put it the other way around - with a business unfriendly license I would not be able to use it - and thus not contribute back - which I would happily do with a business friendly license. A bit like this case: https://github.com/oshoukry/openpojo/issues/63 I really hope you can reconsider this.
@legsem I have to agree with @davidkarlsen. Seeing all the other stuff you are working on, I would have thought this was licensed Apache like Avro and Hadoop.
@legsem Have you considered dual licensing this with something like Apache 2.0?
Would you consider changing the license to ASF2 as it's more business friendly and would allow for more widespread use (and thus contribution)?