Closed sammyjava closed 8 months ago
Also note that the Gene Family report page has a direct attribute link to Funnotate.
Yes. The phylotree web component my summer intern implemented uses it via GraphQL. This hasn't been merged into main yet but I am very much still planning to finish it up and deploy it on the site.
Alan
AH forgot about that. Then we'll keep them in the mines!
@alancleary can you confirm whether that simply requests the Newick string? If so, it might still be possible for @sammyjava to simplify what he's loading (not parsing the trees into Phylonodes with inter-relations). Maybe that is not a big win, though.
I can also probably speed up the loader. The Newick text is the bulk of the data since the other two classes are just relations and identifiers.
OK, I'm happy to keep fully parsed trees if you are.
For sure, just checking on what needs to stay in the garage. :)
Lately I've been skipping the phylotree loader on MiniMine because we've got a linkout to Funnotate. I'm wondering - is there any reason to store the phylotrees in the mines? Are we actually querying them from the mines? We've got linkouts to the trees in a much more useful display.
"View Funnotate phylogram for family of ..."![image](https://github.com/legumeinfo/mine-issues/assets/5657219/31c7ee5b-d933-4c73-968b-dd753719941c)