Make rubo cop not fail

[noahc]

WIP

Trying to fix all Rubocop warnings. Will Continue working on this tomorrow.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 38.66% when pulling b37aa498cb16875cee6c9f2c35b1c89523d69415 on noahc:make-rubo-cop-not-fail into 9dfd233b2f9f2a1bf550364f42a3ea5d6fe4fb6e on leikind:rails3.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 38.66% when pulling ab2a318d73ac43f2d24720becc4dc91509bb98cb on noahc:make-rubo-cop-not-fail into 9dfd233b2f9f2a1bf550364f42a3ea5d6fe4fb6e on leikind:rails3.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 38.66% when pulling bb270e60eb760f17ac2bb1e267feb7523d110b98 on noahc:make-rubo-cop-not-fail into 9dfd233b2f9f2a1bf550364f42a3ea5d6fe4fb6e on leikind:rails3.

[leikind]

You are wasting your time on useless things

[noahc]

Would it be better to remove Rubocop then?

I'm trying to clean up the edges around the test output so my self and others can have increased confidence in a code base we're unfamiliar with. I agree that these changes aren't that significant, but they are the first small steps in getting the code base to a point where those unfamiliar with the code base can work with it with confidence.

Do you disagree?

[leikind]

If wouldn't object to removing Rubocop.

[jdickey]

How about, instead, just creating a .rubocop.yml file that disables the cops you don't (yet) care about?

I've found on a couple of dozen projects (and counting) that RuboCop is one of my three or four pieces of dead-finger tech (along with Flog, Flay, Reek, and Inch). YMMV, but I just thought I'd put in a word.

[leikind]

I am not spending my time on this useless pursuit.