Closed arfio closed 9 years ago
I added "j = 0;" at line 193 because the index was correct just for the first iteration of the out-most for loop. After that iteration j would get out of bound with values up to 1,000,000.
Ooh, nice catch! Thanks for taking a look and being active! =)
I added "j = 0;" at line 193 because the index was correct just for the first iteration of the out-most for loop. After that iteration j would get out of bound with values up to 1,000,000.