Leo,
reorganizei as regras para facilitar usar a seguinte explicação. Veja se faz sentido:
The 34 rules presented above can generally be organized into four large groups. The first, which comprises rules 1 to 10, includes consonant clusters such as czar, ptose and gnomo. They, unlike the examples that will be exposed in section X (exceptions - item 9 currently), present a set of derived words, which makes their marking advantageous in view of the number of cases that are included in this marking rule. The second group, comprising rules 11 to 16, delimits the morphological boundary between prefixes and radicals. As noted, although phonological issues guide the separation of numerous words in Portuguese, there are also those that are guided by morphology. This is the case of words that have the prefixes sub- and re-, such as sublunar and reinserção. The third group, comprising rules 17 to 30, seeks to understand a set of words that have vowel combinations that do not follow the general rules. This is because the Portuguese language has vowel encounters with the second vowel graphically marked that can be separated, forming hiatuses, such as caótico, balneário and razoável, while there are also words with a similar structure that constitute a diphthong, such as português, alguém and linguística. It is remarkable, of course, that the latter are formed by the digraphs qu- and gu-, while the former by vowels other than i and u. The fourth and last group, in turn, which comprises rules 31 to 34,…. NÃO SEI EXPLICAR (ainda!)
It is important to highlight that the words included in these rules are, in general, of low frequency and were incorporated into the Portuguese language without a phonotactic adaptation, which causes these idiosyncrasies and exceptions to the language. They are characterized as marked cases, since it is not possible to defend that they reproduce a phonological pattern of the language because they are not productive, that is, they are not taken as an example and/or derive new words.
https://github.com/leolca/tex-hyphen-pt/blob/62227b4a7f911e863ea704968e1603a06253b8db/article/article.tex#L942
Leo, reorganizei as regras para facilitar usar a seguinte explicação. Veja se faz sentido:
The 34 rules presented above can generally be organized into four large groups. The first, which comprises rules 1 to 10, includes consonant clusters such as czar, ptose and gnomo. They, unlike the examples that will be exposed in section X (exceptions - item 9 currently), present a set of derived words, which makes their marking advantageous in view of the number of cases that are included in this marking rule. The second group, comprising rules 11 to 16, delimits the morphological boundary between prefixes and radicals. As noted, although phonological issues guide the separation of numerous words in Portuguese, there are also those that are guided by morphology. This is the case of words that have the prefixes sub- and re-, such as sublunar and reinserção. The third group, comprising rules 17 to 30, seeks to understand a set of words that have vowel combinations that do not follow the general rules. This is because the Portuguese language has vowel encounters with the second vowel graphically marked that can be separated, forming hiatuses, such as caótico, balneário and razoável, while there are also words with a similar structure that constitute a diphthong, such as português, alguém and linguística. It is remarkable, of course, that the latter are formed by the digraphs qu- and gu-, while the former by vowels other than i and u. The fourth and last group, in turn, which comprises rules 31 to 34,…. NÃO SEI EXPLICAR (ainda!) It is important to highlight that the words included in these rules are, in general, of low frequency and were incorporated into the Portuguese language without a phonotactic adaptation, which causes these idiosyncrasies and exceptions to the language. They are characterized as marked cases, since it is not possible to defend that they reproduce a phonological pattern of the language because they are not productive, that is, they are not taken as an example and/or derive new words.