Closed dawe closed 3 years ago
Assuming the content of info_READ[123] is always sorted, concatenation rule would be more elegant if "cat $(cat {input}) > {output}" is given in place of "for F in $(cat {input}) ; do cat $F>>{output}; done"
info_READ[123]
"cat $(cat {input}) > {output}"
"for F in $(cat {input}) ; do cat $F>>{output}; done"
Assuming the content of
info_READ[123]
is always sorted, concatenation rule would be more elegant if"cat $(cat {input}) > {output}"
is given in place of"for F in $(cat {input}) ; do cat $F>>{output}; done"