Closed leonardocustodio closed 9 months ago
PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/commit/9c8890130440669132227d1342567e1e31088fb5)
PR feedback | |
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the changes are straightforward version bumps in the `pubspec.yaml` and an update in the `CHANGELOG.md`. The complexity is low, and the main focus would be on ensuring compatibility and successful integration of the updated packages. |
🧪 Relevant tests | No |
🔍 Possible issues | - Dependency conflicts might arise if other packages within the project or its dependencies have not yet updated to be compatible with the new versions of `polkadart`, `polkadart_scale_codec`, `substrate_metadata`, and `polkadart_keyring`. - The new features introduced in `polkadart` version `0.4.0`, such as support for custom signed extensions and multisig accounts, might require additional integration efforts or adjustments in the existing codebase to ensure they work as expected. |
🔒 Security concerns | No |
relevant file | packages/polkadart/pubspec.yaml |
suggestion | Consider pinning the dependency versions using the caret (^) syntax to allow for more flexible version updates that are still compatible with the specified major version. This can help in avoiding potential conflicts with other dependencies and makes the upgrade process smoother. For example, instead of `polkadart_scale_codec: 1.2.0`, use `polkadart_scale_codec: ^1.2.0`. [medium] |
relevant line | polkadart_scale_codec: 1.2.0 # Apache 2.0 |
relevant file | packages/polkadart/pubspec.yaml |
suggestion | After updating the package versions, it's a good practice to run `flutter pub get` or `dart pub get` (depending on your project type) to ensure that the dependency resolution completes successfully with the updated versions. This step should ideally be documented in the PR description as part of the upgrade process. [medium] |
relevant line | version: 0.4.0 |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Suggestions | ||
---|---|---|
best practice |
|
Enabling\disabling automationWhen you first install the app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the improve tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] ``` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically. |
Utilizing extra instructionsExtra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
A note on code suggestions quality- While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. - Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. - Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the [custom suggestions :gem:](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/CUSTOM_SUGGESTIONS.md) tool - With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Type
enhancement
Description
polkadart
package version to0.4.0
.polkadart_scale_codec
to1.2.0
,substrate_metadata
to1.2.0
, andpolkadart_keyring
to0.4.0
. These updates are crucial for maintaining compatibility and leveraging new features and bug fixes.Changes walkthrough
pubspec.yaml
Update Polkadart and Dependencies Version
packages/polkadart/pubspec.yaml
polkadart
package version from0.3.2
to0.4.0
.polkadart_scale_codec
from1.1.2
to1.2.0
.substrate_metadata
from1.1.2
to1.2.0
.polkadart_keyring
from0.3.0
to0.4.0
.