leonardocustodio / polkadart

Polkadart provides developers the ability to query a node and interact with the Polkadot based chains using Dart.
https://polkadart.dev
Apache License 2.0
39 stars 16 forks source link

Revert lints which is failing CI/CD #432

Closed justkawal closed 9 months ago

justkawal commented 9 months ago

Type

enhancement


Description


Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
10 files
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in examples                           

examples/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in polkadart                         

packages/polkadart/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in polkadart_cli                 

packages/polkadart_cli/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in polkadart_keyring         

packages/polkadart_keyring/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in polkadart_scale_codec 

packages/polkadart_scale_codec/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in secp256k1_ecdsa             

packages/secp256k1_ecdsa/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in sr25519                             

packages/sr25519/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in ss58                                   

packages/ss58/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in substrate_bip39             

packages/substrate_bip39/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     
pubspec.yaml
Downgrade lints package version in substrate_metadata       

packages/substrate_metadata/pubspec.yaml - Downgrade `lints` package from `^3.0.0` to `^2.0.0`.
+1/-1     

PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/commit/25df2c318f2121f201ff03111eced81b60f15506)

github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the PR involves a straightforward version downgrade across multiple `pubspec.yaml` files without altering the logic or structure of the code. The changes are repetitive and consistent across all modified files.
🧪 Relevant tests No
🔍 Possible issues No
🔒 Security concerns No
Code feedback:

✨ Review tool usage guide:
**Overview:** The `review` tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit [configurations](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml#L19) related to the review tool (`pr_reviewer` section), use the following template: ``` /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=... ``` With a [configuration file](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#working-with-github-app), use the following template: ``` [pr_reviewer] some_config1=... some_config2=... ```
Utilizing extra instructions
The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation
- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels
The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools
The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs
By invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ```
More PR-Agent commands
> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > - **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > - **/add_docs** 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > - **/generate_labels** 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > - **/analyze** 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. >See the [tools guide](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_GUIDE.md) for more details. >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.
See the [review usage](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md) page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.
github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

PR Code Suggestions

CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
Best practice
Specify an exact version for the lints dependency. ___ **Consider specifying the exact version of lints to ensure consistent coding standards and
avoid potential issues with future updates.** [examples/pubspec.yaml [24]](https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/files#diff-27a971b202f8d9e928ddaebc52498f1cd7a092d8e5e84096686d42b74f226954R24-R24) ```diff -lints: ^2.0.0 +lints: 2.0.0 ```
Ensure team awareness of the lints version change. ___ **Verify that all developers are aware of the lints version change to ensure consistency in
code style across the team.** [packages/polkadart_cli/pubspec.yaml [22]](https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/files#diff-496c951a9f5507ea5f79899c05a79af359779ea73cddb8df028fa392139db2cdR22-R22) ```diff -lints: ^2.0.0 +lints: ^2.0.0 # Communicate version change to team ```
Maintainability
Assess the impact of downgrading lints on code quality. ___ **Evaluate if the downgrade of lints impacts any new lint rules that were beneficial to the
project's code quality.** [packages/polkadart/pubspec.yaml [22]](https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/files#diff-d3fc876c90d61f01c426eddc2bdc08e714c7d536a091cbe4c1e00546a6a0a222R22-R22) ```diff -lints: ^2.0.0 +lints: ^2.0.0 # Ensure compatibility with project standards ```
Perform a full project linting after downgrading lints. ___ **After downgrading lints, run a full project linting to identify any new warnings or errors
that need to be addressed.** [packages/polkadart_scale_codec/pubspec.yaml [17]](https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/files#diff-b0cd7d13dce7c06b4e59b192e8302c291c7fcfe6d563e6e400b4dfcda3bf2289R17-R17) ```diff -lints: ^2.0.0 # BSD-3-Clause +lints: ^2.0.0 # BSD-3-Clause, followed by linting the project ```
Ci/cd
Review the impact of lints downgrade on CI workflows. ___ **Consider the impact of the lints downgrade on continuous integration (CI) workflows,
particularly if specific lint rules are enforced.** [packages/substrate_metadata/pubspec.yaml [18]](https://github.com/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/files#diff-05c1ffd9bcb44071c7dea88cafeb08e9bbb9abe96b8d1ecec45f31d4df528d36R18-R18) ```diff -lints: ^2.0.0 +lints: ^2.0.0 # Review CI linting steps ```

✨ Improve tool usage guide:
**Overview:** The `improve` tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. When commenting, to edit [configurations](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml#L69) related to the improve tool (`pr_code_suggestions` section), use the following template: ``` /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=... ``` With a [configuration file](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#working-with-github-app), use the following template: ``` [pr_code_suggestions] some_config1=... some_config2=... ```
Enabling\disabling automation
When you first install the app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the improve tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] ``` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions
Extra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality
- While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. - Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. - Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the [custom suggestions :gem:](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/CUSTOM_SUGGESTIONS.md) tool - With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands
> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > - **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > - **/add_docs** 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > - **/generate_labels** 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > - **/analyze** 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. >See the [tools guide](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_GUIDE.md) for more details. >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.
See the [improve usage](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/IMPROVE.md) page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.
codecov[bot] commented 9 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 48.52%. Comparing base (8de16ca) to head (25df2c3). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files [![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=HG3K4LW5UN&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #432 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 35.18% 48.52% +13.33% =========================================== Files 137 181 +44 Lines 7140 9569 +2429 =========================================== + Hits 2512 4643 +2131 - Misses 4628 4926 +298 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [polkadart](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `16.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [polkadart_cli](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `12.04% <ø> (ø)` | | | [polkadart_keyring](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `65.24% <ø> (ø)` | | | [polkadart_scale_codec](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `54.93% <ø> (ø)` | | | [secp256k1_ecdsa](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `89.60% <ø> (ø)` | | | [sr25519](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `85.91% <ø> (ø)` | | | [ss58](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `96.87% <ø> (ø)` | | | [substrate_bip39](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `56.37% <ø> (ø)` | | | [substrate_metadata](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio) | `87.73% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 44 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/leonardocustodio/polkadart/pull/432/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Leonardo+Custodio)