Make init_errorformat() global function

[petobens]

Is it possible to make the s:init_errorformat() a global function? I like to use vim-latex's error format in a script and in order to do so I have to either run latex#init() (which is a global function) or copy the s:init_errorformat() function to my script.

If this is not possible, if there is another way of calling the init_function from outside the script, or if this breaks some behavior just ignore this request and close the issue. Thank you!

[petobens]

On a related note (and since I read that in the past you looked into dispatch.vim) I wonder if you know how to achieve the following.

I have this function to run my latex files with dispatch.vim;

function! RunDispatch()
    let mainfile = g:latex#data[b:latex.id].tex
    let &l:makeprg = 'arara -v ' . mainfile
    execute 'Make'
endfunction

Once the build finishes I want to call latex#latexmk#errors(force) (because I want to use as a cfile the log file and not the output of arara in the console). Do you know how to call that function once, and only once, the build has finished? I read that

Dispatch fires a QuickFixCmdPost cgetfile event each time a build finishes

but I don't quite understand how to use that. Doing:

augroup ps_dispatch
    au!
    au QuickFixCmdPost cgetfile execute 'cgetfile '.fnameescape(g:latex#data[b:latex.id].log())
augroup END

seems to work if I stay in the tex file. But if I switch to another file (for instance to a .vim file) while the build is running then it fails (presumably because it doesn't know what g:latex#data[b:latex.id].log() means) .

[lervag]

To your first comment: I am not really sure about this. Personally, I would like to keep the plugin as a relatively general latex plugin, although minimalistic and with a well documented API. I find the errorformat to be very intrinsic to the latex filetype, and so I don't really see the need to let the s:init_errorformat be accessible to the user. Since you do not want to call the latex#init() function, it seems you are sort of building your own system based on vim-latex. I am curious to why you do not want to initialize vim-latex; perhaps this issue could be solved by changing something else?

To your second comment: First, I notice that you must have called the init function, or else the g:latex#data should not have been initialized? Anyway. First: g:latex#data[b:latex.id] is only possible in a tex buffer, due to the b:latex.id. If you always only work on a single latex project in one vim instance, then you could use g:latex#data[0]. I think you could call ...#errors(force) with the autocommand as well, but it relies on the b:latex.id variable which is only available in a tex buffer. You could check out vim-quickrun. It seems to allow much more customization than vim-dispatch, but it is also more complicated. I didn't see exactly how, but I think you should be able to add hooks that are called after the compilation is finished.

[petobens]

Thanks for your comment and sorry for my late reply.

I wanted to call init_errorformat() globally because I was trying to compile a latex project on the foreground and asynchronously using vimshell. It kind of works but dispatch is definitely better for asynchronous compilation (although I sacrifice output visibility since it compiles it in the background).

Thanks for suggesting vim-quickrun. I''ll have a look into it.

[lervag]

Ok. I'm curious: Why do you not use latexmk? I can sort of understand that people prefer manual compilation, but this can still be achieved with latexmk. I am currently considering to modify vim-latex to fully support manual mode, but at the moment it should work if you do as explained in #50.

[petobens]

Mmmm I never actually tried latexmk. In fact I thought that i) it didn't work well on Windows and ii) it only allowed continuous compilation. Apparently those two things aren't true.

The thing I like about arara (and the main reason why is use it) is that I can set, through comments in the source file, compilations routines that are specific to each document class.

Do you fully recommend latexmk? Maybe I should give it a try.

[lervag]

I have not personally used arara, but I don't really see why I would want to. latexmk is very convenient, and after I started to use it, I have never looked back. I very much like the continuous mode, but I both understand and respect that others want to have somewhat more control over the compilation. latexmk works well in both cases.

Note that I do use a .latexmkrc file, but vim-latex should pass the most common/important options directly as well.

Btw, you may be interested in this discussion.

[lervag]

@petobens Just FYI: I have now implemented options to disable continuous compilation with latexmk. This means you can set g:latex_latexmk_continuous=0 to get single shot compilations. If you prefer, you may also use g:latex_latexmk_background=1 to make the compilation run in the background.

[petobens]

Thank you lervag for both of comments (I had completely missed the first one, I apologize for that).

The discussion at tex.stackexchange in indeed interesting. Given that and the fact that now it is possible to disable continuous compilation means that I will be trying latexmk in the next days.

Once again for such a great plugin and the excellent support you provide.