Open lukehutch opened 1 year ago
Actually for this usecase, I guess I can just multiply the number of columns in the grid by 9, and the number of rows by 16, and fill a 9x16-multiple area of the grid with each tile, but I imagine that will be inefficient for the layout algorithm?
However even with that solution, the sizes of the cells are not quite right, because I want the usable cell size to have the aspect ratio 9:16, but the size is calculated based on the cell size plus crossAxisSpacing
/ mainAxisSpacing
, which slightly changes the aspect ratio.
... and it looks like there's a fix to that too, to use:
mainAxisSpacing: gridSpacing,
crossAxisSpacing: gridSpacing * 9 / 16,
but these are all workarounds...
Have you tried using "StaggeredGridTile.fit"? You can create custom size tiles thus precise custom aspect ratios
I haven't -- I ended up using a different layout solution.
However, the .fit
constructor is not documented, which is why I didn't discover it -- this needs to be added to the documentation.
StaggeredGrid
uses square grid cells (which can be combined into rectangles, but those rectangles are still multiples of the base square on each axis). I want to make aStaggeredGrid
, but with cells that have a 9:16 aspect ratio. I can't see a way to do this, and the other grid types don't support the type of layouts thatStaggeredGrid
does.