letsencrypt / ct-log-metadata

Metadata regarding Let's Encrypt's Certificate Transparency Logs
8 stars 8 forks source link

[Add Issuer]: AS207960 test root #36

Closed TheEnbyperor closed 9 months ago

TheEnbyperor commented 1 year ago

Mozilla Bugzilla Root Inclusion URL

No response

CA CP/CPS Website URL

https://acmeforonions.org

CT Logs

Issuer Certificate

-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIICsTCCAjigAwIBAgIUET8oCxgBAMLulJa0Efa25KjwTgMwCgYIKoZIzj0EAwQw gYYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMQ4wDAYDVQQIDAVDeW1ydTEcMBoGA1UECgwTQVMyMDc5 NjAgQ3lmeW5nZWRpZzEuMCwGA1UECwwlQVMyMDc5NjAgRGVwYXJ0bWVudCBvZiBS YW5kb20gTnVtYmVyczEZMBcGA1UEAwwQQVMyMDc5NjAgVGVzdCBDQTAgFw0yMTA2 MDgxNjM5NTlaGA8yMDcxMDUyNzE2Mzk1OVowgYYxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMQ4wDAYD VQQIDAVDeW1ydTEcMBoGA1UECgwTQVMyMDc5NjAgQ3lmeW5nZWRpZzEuMCwGA1UE CwwlQVMyMDc5NjAgRGVwYXJ0bWVudCBvZiBSYW5kb20gTnVtYmVyczEZMBcGA1UE AwwQQVMyMDc5NjAgVGVzdCBDQTB2MBAGByqGSM49AgEGBSuBBAAiA2IABOj4cU1O IOfZbJfUBfudoy89Pqy9iK1pbvEsnSxgLzTco3pnb79e0/8cCDkefUcMJCmd4BeM HflMxPDUwJDhTl9jmfj5Y0WdXIE8A/e5fwwfS7ejIykNXjvLpVn6imYGWaNjMGEw HQYDVR0OBBYEFP2gqXjQroXnMegLUU3Y4CQ0cxV+MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFP2gqXjQ roXnMegLUU3Y4CQ0cxV+MA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgGG MAoGCCqGSM49BAMEA2cAMGQCMG+WBaLRGJQSpoWbflYmxYROLP7lWfb6CM3O9BlU oxSvW9WP+af87XMxmeIJZswZBwIwMicNgKCb1DBUwSp22mq5PrRe3EOq8acJXmo6 NZ/8KXW2J/oNbhmbssJfpO8+qXuY -----END CERTIFICATE-----

CT Policy

mcpherrinm commented 1 year ago

Hello!

Our intention with our Sapling test log is primarily for CAs who intend to integrate with our production logs (Oak).

We typically recommend test CAs can test against https://github.com/letsencrypt/boulder/tree/main/test/ct-test-srv which implements the submission APIs typically used by CAs.

Do you require these certs to be in a public log?

What volume of test certificates do you expect to be submitted?

Thank you!

TheEnbyperor commented 1 year ago

The CA is supposed to act like any other publicly trusted CA as closely as possible, so inclusion in a public log would be desired.

In terms of volume I expect on the order of dozens a month, or less.

mcpherrinm commented 1 year ago

What's the path forward here? Do you intend to create a public CA that is trusted by the Mozilla or other root programs?

Sapling is really intended as an integration test target prior to using Oak, our trusted logs, and I'm not sure we want to use it for unrelated testing.

TheEnbyperor commented 1 year ago

Do you intend to create a public CA that is trusted by the Mozilla or other root programs?

Yes that is in our plans, however not with this specific public key.

mcpherrinm commented 9 months ago

This log is intended for integration testing in preparation of using Oak for submitting publicly trusted roots.

I'd encourage you to reopen this issue once you're further in that process (ie, once you have begun the process of becoming a publicly trusted CA).