Nit Permit() test

[audsssy]

Context

• Nit after noticing permit should work if the signature is valid test throws InvalidSignature() via subtext even though it passes test (see below).. not sure why it passes in the first place

KaliDAOtoken.sol - Update input parameter to digest in permit() as nonces[owner]++ throws InvalidSignature()

KaliDAO.test.js

• Update "permit should work if the signature is valid" test logic with expect() to validate expected test result

[vercel[bot]]

@audsssy is attempting to deploy a commit to the LexDAO Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[vercel[bot]]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/lexdao/kali/F8kycDkzqxWYkEHUzH7yob65SRrp
✅ Preview: https://kali-git-fork-audsssy-nit-permit-test-lexdao.vercel.app

[z0r0z]

good stuff @audsssy why do we think incrementing the nonce outside of digest provides fix here? *Edit -- Also, it is quite strange for test to execute permit, but yet also produce revert.

[audsssy]

Update: Looks like the error was a result of unmatched function name between

(1)

and

(2)

Once PERMIT_TYPEHASH in (1) is updated to Permit to match that in (2), the error goes away!

[audsssy]

Update: Looks like the error was a result of unmatched function name between

(1)

and

(2)

Once PERMIT_TYPEHASH in (1) is updated to Permit to match that in (2), the error goes away!

[audsssy]

Woot. Thanks for the review and merge!