search

lexibank / castroyi

CLDF dataset derived from Castro et al.'s "Yi Varieties in Heqing" from 2010
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
0 stars 0 forks source link

Duplicate graphemes #4

Closed chrzyki closed 3 years ago

chrzyki commented 3 years ago 
WARNING:segments.profile:line 37:duplicate grapheme in profile: ^tɕ
WARNING:segments.profile:line 102:duplicate grapheme in profile: hn̩ʔ⁵⁵
WARNING:segments.profile:line 139:duplicate grapheme in profile: tsʰ
WARNING:segments.profile:line 244:duplicate grapheme in profile: ⁵⁵_
WARNING:segments.profile:line 246:duplicate grapheme in profile: ⁵⁵_$
WARNING:segments.profile:line 249:duplicate grapheme in profile: ʔ
WARNING:segments.profile:line 257:duplicate grapheme in profile: pfʰɨ⁵⁵̪̠
chrzyki commented 3 years ago

Thanks, two cases left.

WARNING:segments.profile:line 99:duplicate grapheme in profile: hn̩ʔ⁵⁵
WARNING:segments.profile:line 133:duplicate grapheme in profile: pfʰɨ⁵⁵̪̠
LinguList commented 3 years ago

What are the differences here? I did not receive the warning when running this.

chrzyki commented 3 years ago

cldfbench lexibank.check_profile reports this for me and the two cases are duplicates in the profile.

LinguList commented 3 years ago

I mean: WHICH are the concrete differences between the duplicates in terms of IPA?

LinguList commented 3 years ago

I see, if you check the duplicates, @chrzyki, you find:

hn̩ʔ⁵⁵ h n̩ hn̩ʔ⁵⁵ h n̩ ⁵⁵

obviously, delete the first row.

And

pfʰɨ⁵⁵̪̠ pfʰ ɨ ⁵⁵ + pfʰɨ⁵⁵̪̠ pfʰɨ⁵⁵

obviously, delete the second row.