search

lexibank / hsiuhmongmien

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
0 stars 0 forks source link

tone categories #13

Closed Wu-Urbanek closed 2 months ago

Wu-Urbanek commented 4 years ago

In the raw data (https://github.com/lexibank/hsiuhmongmien/blob/master/raw/HM_official.tsv), there are some tones with /1, /2...etc. Are these the labels for tone categories?

LinguList commented 4 years ago

Yes, I think so.

LinguList commented 4 years ago

Maybe you write Andy and ask him?

andhsiu commented 4 years ago

Sure, I can take a look. But I don't see the file though (404 error).

Andy

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:28 PM Johann-Mattis List notifications@github.com wrote:

Maybe you write Andy and ask him?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lexibank/hsiuhmongmien/issues/13#issuecomment-640831851, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLW5ZAPIFNIPH5JDSKVZ2TRVU3UFANCNFSM4NYVGHUQ .

LinguList commented 4 years ago

Strange, that you can't see that. It is about entries that look like the following: nze⁵³/2 @MacyL wants to know if the /2 refers to one of the inferred tonal categories (like ping shang qu ru in Chinese yinyunxue).

andhsiu commented 4 years ago

For the tonal categories like "2", see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Tai#Tones

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:45 PM Johann-Mattis List notifications@github.com wrote:

Strange, that you can't see that. It is about entries that look like the following: nze⁵³/2 @MacyL https://github.com/MacyL wants to know if the /2 refers to one of the inferred tonal categories (like ping shang qu ru in Chinese yinyunxue).

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lexibank/hsiuhmongmien/issues/13#issuecomment-641042702, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLW5ZHEHJGADW7EAPOJF53RVXD55ANCNFSM4NYVGHUQ .

MuffinLinwist commented 2 months ago

@LinguList, this has to do indeed with tone categories (also whether they are voiced or voiceless). is there a plan to do something with this (I'm asking in the context of the lexibank 2.0 release)? right now the cliff conversion does not include this.

MuffinLinwist commented 2 months ago

@LinguList brief reminder so we can have this issue resolved for the lexibank 2.0 release.

LinguList commented 2 months ago

@MuffinLinwist fixed now.