In order to illustrate the integrative potential of lexibank data, I suggest to make some kind of a plot where we contrast the availability of a given language, identified by glottocode, with some major datasets.
An earlier idea was to look at Glottolog's endangerment information, but maybe we can instead show how lexibank integrates with the major datasets that have been used so far?
I imagine, for example, a plot in which we show (using pie-charts divided into four slots):
availability in phoible
availability in asjp (we have some datasets they lack still, I think)
availability in WALS
availability in glottolog
The latter can be seen as criticism in our missing links, but also as an example of how our collections could in the future contribute to expanding glottolog, since by now, we have cases where dialectal variation is not yet reflected in glottolog, and we have geocoordinates and the like at our disposal in lexibank.
An alternative would be to add one more dataset, but I'd not know which or to take only three.
In order to illustrate the integrative potential of lexibank data, I suggest to make some kind of a plot where we contrast the availability of a given language, identified by glottocode, with some major datasets.
An earlier idea was to look at Glottolog's endangerment information, but maybe we can instead show how lexibank integrates with the major datasets that have been used so far?
I imagine, for example, a plot in which we show (using pie-charts divided into four slots):
The latter can be seen as criticism in our missing links, but also as an example of how our collections could in the future contribute to expanding glottolog, since by now, we have cases where dialectal variation is not yet reflected in glottolog, and we have geocoordinates and the like at our disposal in lexibank.
An alternative would be to add one more dataset, but I'd not know which or to take only three.