Closed chrzyki closed 1 year ago
While this would be probably good practice, it might be overkill to enforce it - and will make re-creating old datasets with new pylexibank versions more fragile. Thus, I'd rather add this to recommendations somewhere.
Whenever a table is non-standard CLDF (no
propertyUrl
pointing to terms in any version of the CLDF ontology), it might be beneficial to always write and/or require adc:description
withpylexibank
. See for example the CLDF version of APiCS for a number of non-standard CLDF columns with gooddc:description
s.