Closed MervideHeer closed 3 years ago
Yes, I think this will go into raw/
. I'll merge first and then move things around.
@MervideHeer It seems that two columns from raw/Data.tsv
have been dropped in UraLex 2.0: age_term_pq
and age_term_aq
. Is this intentional? Or should the values of UraLex 1 be merged into the new data?
@MervideHeer It seems that two columns from
raw/Data.tsv
have been dropped in UraLex 2.0:age_term_pq
andage_term_aq
. Is this intentional? Or should the values of UraLex 1 be merged into the new data?
Hi, I have dropped the two age-columns from the UraLex 2.0 data tsv intentionally so they shouldn't be merged. I made the same drop in the ods-file and explained it in the 2.0 documentation too.
I also wanted to mention that UraLex 2.0 needs so checking regarding the other files before we archive 2.0 to Zenodo. We'll do this relatively soon.
Are you going to re-upload the files after checking - or is the checking going to happen in this repository?
It is possible that something needs to be re-uploaded but I don't know more about this phase yet.
Dear UraLex editors, I have created a new branch for the UraLex 2.0 update which concerns the loanword information. This branch should represent the information that will be a new DOI version in Zenodo.
I have included an UraLex 2.0 folder that contains the most critical files: -The UraLex. 2.0 data files as tsv and odt files -The Borrowing references as a simple list in a tsv as well as a BibTex file -The UraLex 2.0 documentation as a Markdown file -The additional information tsv-sheets for the UraLex meanings, meaning lists, meaning list descriptions, languages, language compilers, citations and citation codes. These sheets are identical to the first release because UraLex 2.0 does not make any changes to them.
As you can see, I have not changed any other UraLex files. Should the UraLex 2.0 folder become the new "raw" of this branch?