Open LinguList opened 2 years ago
Further plans can be discussed here.
So, the plan would be to enrich CLDF creation, creating
as well? If so, should cognate detection be added as well?
That would be cool, I assume.
And would the paper come with a derived dataset for inventories, features, etc. or would this be added to the CLDF data in this repository?
When discussing how that paper should be structured, we realized it should have features calculated as in lexibank, so the paper would also be similar, with the difference being sound data and that the data was collected from original field work. Somehow, such a dataset CRIES for automatically inferred features, I think.
I would say that exactly this should be done, yes. Extended CLDF data should be added to the repository.
I guess, cognate detection would be really nice, because that would provide another opportunity to highlight the soundfiles: Having an audio-player next to the alignments of a cognate set could be interesting!
Would be a small step towards linking sound change and sound signal - if only visually.
Yes, we could definitely try it. And if we use a conservative threshold, we'd emphasize: these are the "good" cognates, where we have confidence, more will be added through manual annotation some time in the future, or similar.
Linking the sound files and cognate sets would be excellent! Timo and I will discuss the features when we meet early next week together and will report back.
The basic paper to introduce VV data should provide: