Currently, for tracepoints such as reaction_starts and reaction_ends, the reaction index is passed to the dst_id field of the tracerecord. This is a little inconsistent and the better approach would be to add a new field to the trace record called reaction_idx.
This would likely also need changes in the various trace_to_X utilities and fedsd and other external trace plugins.
One goal in this design is to fit as many trace points as possible into an in-memory buffer. I suggest instead changing the name of the field rather than increasing the footprint of each record.
Currently, for tracepoints such as
reaction_starts
andreaction_ends
, the reaction index is passed to thedst_id
field of the tracerecord. This is a little inconsistent and the better approach would be to add a new field to the trace record calledreaction_idx
.This would likely also need changes in the various
trace_to_X
utilities andfedsd
and other external trace plugins.