lfilho / dotfiles

NeoVim + git + zsh + tmux bliss
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License
24 stars 6 forks source link

Just a Question #36

Open daxgames opened 7 months ago

daxgames commented 7 months ago

@lfilho I am getting back to trying out your fork of skwp/dotfiles via my own fork of your work. I am looking at it more critically and that has generated some questions.

You seem to be using this repo as more of an all encompassing workstation setup vs. terminal configuration framework like skwp/dotfiles.

Would that be a fair assessment?

I ask this because the Brewfile seems to install A LOT of stuff that is not terminal related, or is the extra software somehow used by the nvim plugins.

It really does more than I want and was wondering if I remove most of the stuff from the Brewfile in my fork if I was going to break a bunch of stuff.

If I chose to modify the Brewfile and continued to use it on both MacOS and Linux what would be the bare minimum Brewfile without breaking things?

brew 'bat'
brew 'ctags'
brew 'neovim'
brew 'tmux'
brew 'zsh'

I included tmux above because I compile it on Linux and do not use the native package anyway.

I was even looking at the possibility of reverting to not even using brew unless it was on MacOS and leaving the Brewfile alone since I install most of that stuff on MacOS using brew already. I would probably just create a function in the Rakefile to install the nvim requirements if the OS were Linux.

I don't know, it just seems odd to me to use Homebrew on Linux instead of the native package managers that are already there. I'm not sure how I feel about how it creates a whole separate filesystem tree with stuff it installs and that I can end up with Firefox from both native package manager and Homebrew.

Am I over thinking this?

lfilho commented 7 months ago

Hi @daxgames you are correct. I install more things than just vim stuff. They're most terminal related but not nvim related.

A reason for using brew on linux is it being agnostic of which flavor or linux you have and also working with macos, so it's less work to maintain it here, and i will work if you use arch, debian, or whatever ;)

Also, brew tends to keep packages more up to date than official packages from, say, Ubuntu.

I install this dotfiles first thing when installing a new system, so my Firefox will usually be the one from Brew and I won't install it from any other source anyway, so I don't have that problem you mentioned.

Hope that helped

daxgames commented 7 months ago

Yeah I was aware of the more current versions provided by Homebrew. I am not always in full control of the machines I work with so the included Brewfile can be installing duplicate stuff.

daxgames commented 3 months ago

Unfortunately I am also forced to work with WSL v1 in SOME CASES and it does not play nice with Homebrew.

I have jumped in with both feet and created a combined fork of skwp/dotfiles and lfilho/dotfiles that does both vim and neovim for those of us just playing with the idea of switching from vim to neovim.

Differences from lfilho/dotfiles and skwp/dotfiles: