search

lfnetworking / process

1 stars 4 forks source link

People for tooling workgroup #1

Open edwarnicke opened 5 years ago

zxiiro commented 5 years ago

I'd like to volunteer in this group.

morganrOL commented 5 years ago

I'd like to volunteer in this group.

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

Count me in too :)

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

From the IRC channel:

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

@tnadeau you want in?

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

@bdfreeman1421 welcome to the party :)

adetalhouet commented 5 years ago

Glad to be a part of this group.

tnadeau commented 5 years ago

yes please

On Jan 16, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Ed Warnicke notifications@github.com wrote:

@tnadeau https://github.com/tnadeau you want in?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lfnetworking/process/issues/1#issuecomment-454837599, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3Sbb0XRix268Rjv7DawbkR41hySsz7ks5vD09CgaJpZM4aDZS0.

randybias commented 5 years ago

I'm in.

wenjing commented 5 years ago

I'm in, Ed.

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

This is starting to look like a party :)

Would it make sense to look at the kinds of things that are possible with modern infra first? I could walk you through an example of Github+CircleCI (including running integration testing on packet.net) and Github+Hugo+Netlify for websites and docs if that would help folks see the space of possibilities :)

morganrOL commented 5 years ago

on our side, we moved to gitlab even if we keep github for legacy repositories + some features. We really appreciate the built-in CI/CD and artifact/web features from gitlab. As gitlab is opensource (unlike github) it is possible to have an internal instance (for bare metal automation we do not want to host some security information outside our servers) and public gitlab. The CI/CD can chain pipelines on both sides (see ONS Europe presentation: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Orange-Openlab-A-Full-Automated-Telco-Stack-for-the-Community-David-Blaisonneau-Nicolas-Edel-Orange.pdf). The integration with kubernetes is also very convenient. The management of artifacts is easy and the possibility to automatically create a web site is also a nice feature. github remains cool for its link to docker hub.

ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/ https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/pages/#doc-nav

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

@morganrOL Lets put gitlab on the table as well as an option then. It tends to have almost as good ecosystem link ins as github.

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

I've put up a doodle poll for a kickoff meeting time:

https://doodle.com/poll/hsz7p59np3wbf7hp

Please weigh in :)

bramwelt commented 5 years ago

Count me in too!

kfaseela commented 5 years ago

Interested!

askb commented 5 years ago

+1. want to volunteer.

edwarnicke commented 5 years ago

OK ... doodle poll says Fri 8am PT. Please subscribe to this calendar to get the invite:

https://calendar.google.com/calendar?cid=NnVnMzdpYnBidG9vaXY3MXY5azUyaGlxbzRAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ

@zxiiro Could you get us a zoom meeting we could use instead of my webex which is currently on it?

zxiiro commented 5 years ago

@edwarnicke looks like Casey took care of the Zoom meeting but let me know if there's anything else I can help with :)

mnaser commented 5 years ago

I'd like to perhaps propose showing off Zuul for one of the calls if that works?

vmbrasseur commented 5 years ago

@mnaser LF doesn't support Zuul, alas. Tungsten Fabric is required to move off it in its transition to LFN.

mnaser commented 5 years ago

@vmbrasseur I think this is about looking into new potential tooling (and we've provided hosted/managed/supported Zuul, so I wanted to know if that option is open to be explored).