lfz / DSB2017

The solution of team 'grt123' in DSB2017
MIT License
1.24k stars 418 forks source link

how to measure the result good or not? #20

Open hflyzju opened 7 years ago

hflyzju commented 7 years ago

Epoch 130 (lr 0.00010) Train: tpr 0.00, tnr 100.00, total pos 1317, total neg 3762, time 715.10 loss 0.7080, classify loss 0.6632, regress loss 0.0048, 0.0045, 0.0050, 0.0305

Validation: tpr 0.00, tnr 100.00000000, total pos 216, total neg 19458320, time 18.70 loss 0.7367, classify loss 0.6942, regress loss 0.0033, 0.0035, 0.0031, 0.0327

Train, epoch 130, loss2 20.3725, miss loss 0.5777, acc 0.2627, tpn 419, fpn 1176, fnn 0, time 1497.73, lr 0.00010 Valid, epoch 130, loss2 20.4470, miss loss 0.6395, acc 0.2600, tpn 91, fpn 259, fnn 0, time 95.32 Valid, epoch 130, loss2 20.3725, miss loss 0.5829, acc 0.2627, tpn 419, fpn 1176, fnn 0, time 423.61

is this training result normal?

m-wei commented 7 years ago

I am the same as you! Do you test the model that the author give? what about the result??

hflyzju commented 7 years ago

why the acc 0.2627 is so low?@lfz

lfz commented 7 years ago

I don't think it's normal, what is your batch size?

bcyin commented 6 years ago

Hey, have you solved this problem? I got the same problem.

lmz123321 commented 3 years ago

@hflyzju I encounted the same problem as yours. I changed b2 from 12 to 16(2*N), then got a stage-2 AUC=0.82