Open lgrosz opened 1 month ago
Often times approach beta differs based on the kind of formation.. Mountain A (east face), Mountain A (west face).. does this introduce the idea of a "greater" formation? Does that just become an "area..." How to model this abstractly and correctly...
The geometry of the object may be nice.. this was it can be dynamically places on a map.. Whether that's a point or a polygon..
But maybe that's a bit out of scope for this structure.. it'd probably be unlikely to be used unless in niche use-cases.
The implementation of something like this probably belongs in another library (like one that integrates with GIS-type programs).
Climbs are often located on walls, boulders, mountains, ice-pillars, etc. These are all just formations of some kind. These formations have attributes like