The implicated read names appear to be in the right place in each file. Here, I was frustrated since the error message didn't match what I was seeing. Finally, I just went to look at the sequences:
ah ha; an empty sequencing sequencing line (this was the result of a homebrew trimming system that clearly failed here).
Nothing fundamentally wrong with bwa, but it took me embarrassingly long to find this particular error. I don't have an obvious recommendation for what to do better. If anything, but I wanted to document this behavior.
I ran into this today (using
0.7.16a
)Hmm, okay, reads are not pairing properly across fastq files, so investigating further:
The implicated read names appear to be in the right place in each file. Here, I was frustrated since the error message didn't match what I was seeing. Finally, I just went to look at the sequences:
ah ha; an empty sequencing sequencing line (this was the result of a homebrew trimming system that clearly failed here).
Nothing fundamentally wrong with
bwa
, but it took me embarrassingly long to find this particular error. I don't have an obvious recommendation for what to do better. If anything, but I wanted to document this behavior.