Closed Dmitry-Antipov closed 3 months ago
Yes, expected. All SA alignments are short and not contained in each other on the query.
but the primary alignment has same 40 matches as first alternative reported in SA - it doesn't matter? as far as I see, primary cigar overlaps with first SA one, 43S40M68S and 21S40M90S
Hits can have overlaps.
Noticed that some low quality reads may still have high alignment quality values reported by bwa. For example here we have a chimeric alternative alignment reported, with same amount of aligned bases as in primary alignment, but the qual is still 60
A00675:75:H5CNNDSXY:1:1101:32127:29606 113 utig4-1646 2173421 60 43S40M68S utig4-1666 2218825 0 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCTTTTCAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGCGATAGTACTGGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATC FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,:,FFFF,:F,:F::F:FFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:FFFF:F NM:i:0 MD:Z:40 MC:Z:75M76S AS:i:40 XS:i:25 SA:Z:utig4-1646,2173421,-,21S40M90S,0,0;utig4-56,21392969,-,39M112S,60,2;
Is it expected behavior?